• Health
  • Science
  • U.S.
  • Technology
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

Building a Better World

News and information

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Our Team

Cat bites may lead to serious infections: Study

February 11, 2014 By Contributor

Cat bites may lead to serious infections: Study

Cat bites may be more harmful than originally thought.

Many of us know that animal bites can be serious, even if they come from domesticated animals. This is especially true if the bite has punctured the skin.

Now, however, recent research by the Mayo Clinic points towards solid evidence that cat bites in particular can be quite harmful. At first, a cat bite may seem to be less serious than the bite of another animal, such as a dog. However, the Mayo Clinic has found these bites sometimes have dire consequences, especially when they occur on the hand.

The new research study, which was printed in Journal of Hand Surgery in February 2014, reports that cat bites in the hand are especially dangerous. In fact, one out of three people who were bitten on the hand by a cat ended up being hospitalized. The main reason is because cats have sharp teeth that can penetrate into the skin and subsequently inject germs into the area. When compared to dogs, which have more bluntly shaped teeth, a cat’s bite stabs farther down into the skin, putting the victim at a higher risk of infection.

Study senior Dr. Brian Carlsen, a plastic surgeon and orthopedic hand surgeon at the Mayo Clinic, says that even a small pinpoint bite mark can be a big problem. “The bacteria get into the tendon sheath or into the joint where they can grow with relative protection from the blood and immune system.”

The research involved approximately 200 cat bite cases between 2009 and 2011. Each person had been bitten on their hand. Nearly half of these patients went to an emergency room for treatment, while the rest went to a primary care doctor. The study found that on average, the patients waited for 27 hours before getting treatment. Of the number of infected individuals, 57 required hospitalization, although just 36 were admitted immediately after seeking emergency care.

In total, 38 of the hospitalized patients required surgery to clean the area and remove any infected tissue. The journal reports that eight patients needed a second surgery, and a few had to have reconstructive surgery. Ultimately, 80 percent of study participants needed oral antibiotics, while 14 percent were admitted to the hospital after oral antibiotics failed to work.

Sharing

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Filed Under: Front Page, Health, None

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebookrss

Search:

Recent Posts

  • NASA’s InSight spacecraft makes important course correction May 26, 2018
  • Scientists outraged at latest Trump decision May 15, 2018
  • Huge uproar erupts over major incident at Utah park May 13, 2018
  • Incredible moon discovery stuns scientists May 12, 2018
  • Authorities shocked by discovery about common painkiller May 6, 2018
  • Outrageous crocodile experiment stuns scientists May 5, 2018
  • Great Barrier Reef is too quiet, scientists say May 1, 2018
  • Massive Hiroshima bomb discovery shocks scientists May 1, 2018
  • Earth will be slammed by massive asteroid April 29, 2018
  • Teens are doing something incredibly alarming in schools April 29, 2018
  • Huge discovery in Tasmania stuns scientists April 28, 2018
  • Shocking discovery in New Jersey stuns authorities April 22, 2018
  • Huge volcanic explosion could wipe out the United States April 21, 2018
  • Huge controversy erupts over world’s hottest pepper April 15, 2018
  • SpaceX is about to do something astonishing April 15, 2018

Copyright © 2021 Jones Kilmartin Group, LLC · Metro Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress